---
title: "How I am structuring my review paper"
subtitle: ": Towards a Systematic Review"
author: "Hyesop Shin"
date: '2021-03-05'
output:
xaringan::moon_reader:
lib_dir: libs
css: xaringan-themer.css
nature:
highlightStyle: github
highlightLines: true
countIncrementalSlides: false
---
class: inverse, top, left
Temporary Title
Factors Negatively affecting the Participation of Geographic Crowdsourcing Projects: a Systematic Review
Motivation
Why do we see biases in participatory mapping projects?
If so, what are the main factors associated with the bias?
Motivation for a Systematic Review
Several papers have investigated possible factors that hinder the participation in crowdsourced mapping in their VGI projects
Most empirical studies have extensive questions which can be less generalisable
To our knowledge, none of the published reviews identified or analysed the available evidence from a strict systematic approach
Advantages of a Systematic Review
- To improve decision that are maximally informed and minimally biased
- The transparency of the selection criteria is a safe bet with academic markers and journal peer reviewers ⇒ “how and why were the studies included or excluded?”
- Far less stressful and far more manageable
Research Objective and Questions
Objective
- To review and analyse the main factors that underlie a major barrier for Public VGI projects
Research Questions
- What factors are associated with the under-represent of participation in VGI projects?
- Are there other non-demographic factors that can hinder VGI projects which are not revealed yet?
A PRISMA Guideline