[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: git
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical
From: "Schalk, Ken" <ken.schalk () intel ! com>
Date: 2010-08-31 21:05:51
Message-ID: EF9FEAB3A4B7D245B0801936B6EF4A2533CEF8 () azsmsx503 ! amr ! corp ! intel ! com
[Download message RAW]
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 22:14, Schalk, Ken <ken.schalk@intel.com> wrote:
> > + ln -s e a &&
> Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the
> SYMLINKS prereq.
I used a symlink here to try and duplicate the original problem case that a git user \
at Intel brought to me. I admit I didn't consider the problem of testing on \
platforms without symlink support.
I'm having a little difficulty generating a rename/add conflict inside this test \
without using a symlink, which seems odd to me as the symlink doesn't seem to be \
necessary in an experiment I did by hand. I'll either re-submit with this portion of \
the test conditional on symlink support, or with an alternate test that doesn't use \
symlinks (if I can get that to work in the test).
--Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic