[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       git
Subject:    RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical
From:       "Schalk, Ken" <ken.schalk () intel ! com>
Date:       2010-08-31 21:05:51
Message-ID: EF9FEAB3A4B7D245B0801936B6EF4A2533CEF8 () azsmsx503 ! amr ! corp ! intel ! com
[Download message RAW]

> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 22:14, Schalk, Ken <ken.schalk@intel.com> wrote:

> > +       ln -s e a &&

> Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the
> SYMLINKS prereq.

I used a symlink here to try and duplicate the original problem case that a git user \
at Intel brought to me.  I admit I didn't consider the problem of testing on \
platforms without symlink support.

I'm having a little difficulty generating a rename/add conflict inside this test \
without using a symlink, which seems odd to me as the symlink doesn't seem to be \
necessary in an experiment I did by hand.  I'll either re-submit with this portion of \
the test conditional on symlink support, or with an alternate test that doesn't use \
symlinks (if I can get that to work in the test).

--Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic